06 September 2006
More about those ‘jobs Americans won’t do’
10:19 AM
Ruben Navarette, of the San Diego Union-Tribune, has a column on the subject of ‘jobs Americans won’t do.’ I’ve blogged on this before (here), and it amounts to this: we are not talking about jobs Americans won’t do, but about jobs Americans don’t really have to do because they have other options.
Navarette, attempting to demonstrate his case tells us about his appearance on a radio talk show:
A few months ago, while appearing on a radio show in Louisville, Ky., I tested the theory with a hypothetical. I blurted out that I'd offer a summer job on a horse farm – cleaning out stalls and other delightful tasks – to any young person who called into the station. I'd pay $200 per day, I said, which is a lot more than those jobs really pay.
When a call came in, I thought my experiment failed. Then the producer informed me that the call was from a mother who was asking for the job on behalf of her son.
That doesn't count. But it does illustrate my point. It's jobs that Americans won't do – not jobs that Americans won't do unless they're secured by mommy.
Not so fast, Ruben. The problem here isn’t that this mommy’s boy won’t do the job. It is just as I say: he doesn’t have to do the job because he has another option. His mommy has obviously given him the option of not working unless she lines up a job for him--something I doubt my parents even had nightmares, much less dreams, about permitting me to do.
And our federal government provides many other Americans a similar option: they get to live off those of us who are working. (And if they do want to work, why they can even be educated and trained at our expense.
Navarette, attempting to demonstrate his case tells us about his appearance on a radio talk show:
A few months ago, while appearing on a radio show in Louisville, Ky., I tested the theory with a hypothetical. I blurted out that I'd offer a summer job on a horse farm – cleaning out stalls and other delightful tasks – to any young person who called into the station. I'd pay $200 per day, I said, which is a lot more than those jobs really pay.
When a call came in, I thought my experiment failed. Then the producer informed me that the call was from a mother who was asking for the job on behalf of her son.
That doesn't count. But it does illustrate my point. It's jobs that Americans won't do – not jobs that Americans won't do unless they're secured by mommy.
Not so fast, Ruben. The problem here isn’t that this mommy’s boy won’t do the job. It is just as I say: he doesn’t have to do the job because he has another option. His mommy has obviously given him the option of not working unless she lines up a job for him--something I doubt my parents even had nightmares, much less dreams, about permitting me to do.
And our federal government provides many other Americans a similar option: they get to live off those of us who are working. (And if they do want to work, why they can even be educated and trained at our expense.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
- James Frank Solís
- Former soldier (USA). Graduate-level educated. Married 26 years. Texas ex-patriate. Ruling elder in the Presbyterian Church in America.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(300)
-
▼
September
(33)
- Proclaim liberty throughout the land
- Partying with Lileks? Could be fun.
- Inconsistency, thy name is ‘Liberal’
- Yoda and Han Solo: a deep thought
- Are executive compensation packages too high? (1)
- The Wallace-Clinton interview; a post script
- A paradoxical necessity of the Iraqi theater
- Clinton on Fox. Or was it the other way around?
- Joseph Ratzinger: a serious opponent in a continen...
- What Chavez and Ahmadinejad both understand about ...
- Which Narnia character am I?
- Maybe it’s more like ‘jobs Americans can’t get to ...
- What’s wrong with Common Article 3
- Attention angry (and ignorant!) Muslims: The Pope ...
- Oh, I get it: The Geneva Conventions are a suicide...
- Yes. Let’s rob Muslims of their case against us. (2)
- The Path from 911
- Five years after
- Really, just why do nations rise and fall?
- The ‘conservative’ stereotype and climate change: ...
- Ignoring the Constitution? What Constitution?
- Victor David Hanson on The Good Life
- This is what happens when fools play at wisdom
- More about those ‘jobs Americans won’t do’
- Here’s how Katie should close her evening broadcast
- A “war” by another name
- Yes. Let’s rob Muslims of much of their case agai...
- Forget the cup. Enjoy the coffee
- Can we please stop the 'final throes' nonsense?
- The next change here at Deviant Scholar
- As 11 September approaches, let's recall another d...
- Apparently, the problem with our education system ...
- The First Amendment's 'religion clause' limits rel...
-
▼
September
(33)
0 comments: