09 September 2008
More of the same? Great, considering the alternative.
10:16 AM
I love this ad.
If the alternative to someone who thinks (rightly, I might add) that the fundamentals of the economy are strong and who owns seven houses is Senator Obama then, yes, I’ll gladly take four more years of the same.
Besides, I reject the notion that anyone, even a President, has to be “in touch” with me and my problems in order to do the job. I don’t need anyone to be “in touch” with me; I don’t need anyone to “feel my pain”. I prefer someone who thinks that, as a science, economics is no more about the equal distribution of wealth than biology is about the equal distribution of intellingence. I prefer someone who does not think that government exists to do for you what you cannot, or will not do for yourself. I prefer someone who prefers statehood to statism, someone who thinks that the Constitution protects formal rights, not material rights.
I also don’t think that someone who can afford $18K to $20K for tuition to send his daughters to a private school, is really in touch with most Americans. He certainly is not in touch with me. I may not be struggling to pay my mortgage (yet!), but I certainly don’t have $20K to spend on tuition.
Now, getting back to that business about the fundamentals of the economy being strong: they are. The problem for Democrats, especially the more socialist-leaning types, is not that our economy isn't fundamentally strong. The problem for them is that our economy is fundamentally wrong -- because it is still fundamentally capitalist. They think it should be fundamentally Marxist. How else to explain that every so-called economic crisis is to them justification for making the economy more and more “social” (i.e., Marxist) in structure?
NOTE: One of the reasons I'm not stuggling to pay my mortgage is that I did not seek a mortgage I should have known I cannot afford. Neither could I have been pressured into an unaffordable mortgage by an "unscrupulous, predatory" lender: I have some backbone. Nor was I sold a mortgage, despite the huge risk, because of the minority group to which I belong (i.e., hispanic). I have a mortgage for the old-fashioned reasons: my income and my credit rating make me an acceptable risk.
Some of those who are struggling to pay their mortgages have themselves, not the "out of touch" Senator McCain, to blame for their present circumstances. The specific problem is one of the Seven Deady Sins: Envy.
If the alternative to someone who thinks (rightly, I might add) that the fundamentals of the economy are strong and who owns seven houses is Senator Obama then, yes, I’ll gladly take four more years of the same.
Besides, I reject the notion that anyone, even a President, has to be “in touch” with me and my problems in order to do the job. I don’t need anyone to be “in touch” with me; I don’t need anyone to “feel my pain”. I prefer someone who thinks that, as a science, economics is no more about the equal distribution of wealth than biology is about the equal distribution of intellingence. I prefer someone who does not think that government exists to do for you what you cannot, or will not do for yourself. I prefer someone who prefers statehood to statism, someone who thinks that the Constitution protects formal rights, not material rights.
I also don’t think that someone who can afford $18K to $20K for tuition to send his daughters to a private school, is really in touch with most Americans. He certainly is not in touch with me. I may not be struggling to pay my mortgage (yet!), but I certainly don’t have $20K to spend on tuition.
Now, getting back to that business about the fundamentals of the economy being strong: they are. The problem for Democrats, especially the more socialist-leaning types, is not that our economy isn't fundamentally strong. The problem for them is that our economy is fundamentally wrong -- because it is still fundamentally capitalist. They think it should be fundamentally Marxist. How else to explain that every so-called economic crisis is to them justification for making the economy more and more “social” (i.e., Marxist) in structure?
NOTE: One of the reasons I'm not stuggling to pay my mortgage is that I did not seek a mortgage I should have known I cannot afford. Neither could I have been pressured into an unaffordable mortgage by an "unscrupulous, predatory" lender: I have some backbone. Nor was I sold a mortgage, despite the huge risk, because of the minority group to which I belong (i.e., hispanic). I have a mortgage for the old-fashioned reasons: my income and my credit rating make me an acceptable risk.
Some of those who are struggling to pay their mortgages have themselves, not the "out of touch" Senator McCain, to blame for their present circumstances. The specific problem is one of the Seven Deady Sins: Envy.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
- James Frank Solís
- Former soldier (USA). Graduate-level educated. Married 26 years. Texas ex-patriate. Ruling elder in the Presbyterian Church in America.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(252)
-
▼
September
(45)
- On the “contrived” necessity of state control
- Self-government versus the police state
- Death to the world? -- Wisdom Sunday
- Although they made mention of fundamental differen...
- McCain gives his resume again to make a guarantee....
- Another mini-speech by McCain.Both of them are lon...
- Yes, let's get healthcare for everyone. Let's also...
- If we truly are focused solely on Iraq (think abou...
- Senator Obama, why are we just assuming that those...
- You too, Senator Obama. Yes or no. And then the el...
- I wish McCain could just have answered yes or no o...
- I've been thinking: McCain just said that Russia w...
- I've looked. And I can't find any one of substance...
- Oh, yes. Internation peace keepers -- they always ...
- Yes, it was really silly of the President to talk ...
- Oh, I see. We just explain to Russia that they can...
- Yes, sit down with someone who has called Israel a...
- So, McCain must unquestionably yield to his adviso...
- One difference between the Soviet Union on the one...
- The War in Iraq has strengthened Iran? He can't be...
- I don't know that Iran's neighbors will feel the n...
- In all honesty, Senator McCain, how can anyone kno...
- Great: the Battle of the Bracelets.You just knew h...
- Now mini-campaign speech from Senator McCain.I don...
- But troops ought to be on the defensive, Senator O...
- Exactly: the strategy which Obama condems in Iraq ...
- No one said Iraq was directly involved in 911. Wha...
- There we go with another mention of bin Ladin. If ...
- Good point, Senator McCain: Obama concedes that th...
- Blogging the debate
- Not quite innocent
- Sure McCain ruined the bailout deal, but so what?
- The manic gambling machine
- Better uses for $700 Billion
- Why is anyone still listening to Paulson and Berna...
- Not even half-empty
- Gramm-Leach-Bliley caused all this? Okay, but how?
- The love of money
- The church as a hospital -- Wisdom Sunday
- Sure, blame God
- Okay, Jesus was a community organizer...of sorts
- Vote for Obama because it’s what Europeans want
- In memory of the 9-11 attacks, but probably not a ...
- And I thought Palin was too kind
- More of the same? Great, considering the alternative.
-
▼
September
(45)
0 comments: