04 April 2012
3:19 PM
The philosopher in me wonders: For a given proposition, "P", and it's negation, "~P" (i.e., "not-P"), of what significance is it that 43% of one group believe "P" and 84% of some other group believe "~P"?
H/T: Instapundit
Maybe garbage like this explains why we continue to lag behind other nations in science education. Aside from the fact that most of us don't need to work sci and tech jobs.
"Hello, Pot? This Kettle. You're black." (See this, also.)
Kevin Drum on why inflation is good. (What he really shows is why free marketeers are right about the effects of a free market, especially for labor.)
Some people, like attorney David Dow, think judicial activism is a good thing. So good, in fact, that its practicioners deserve to be called prophets.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
- James Frank Solís
- Former soldier (USA). Graduate-level educated. Married 26 years. Texas ex-patriate. Ruling elder in the Presbyterian Church in America.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(27)
-
▼
April
(6)
- David Boaz on the 'social Darwinism' nonsense, and...
- The philosopher in me wonders: For a given proposi...
- 61% of voters think it’s likely Obamacare will be ...
- Having read most of the "Obamacare" bill before it...
- I missed this last week: a brief amicus brief by H...
- Maybe George Zimmerman isn't a racist.
-
▼
April
(6)
0 comments: