26 September 2008
The manic gambling machine
12:10 PM
The manic gambling machine
Yes, the law permits foolishness.
It wasn't that Wall Street's leaders deceived customers or lenders into taking risks that were known to be hazardous. Instead, they concluded that risks were low or nonexistent. They fooled themselves, because the short-term rewards blinded them to the long-term dangers. -- Robert SamuelsonRobert Samuelson traced some of “Wall Street’s Unraveling” on 17 September.
First, financial firms have moved beyond their traditional roles as advisers and intermediaries. Once, major investment banks such as Goldman Sachs and Lehman worked mainly for their clients. They traded stocks and bonds for major institutional investors (insurance companies, pension funds, mutual funds). They raised capital for companies by underwriting -- selling -- new stocks and bonds for the firms. They provided advice to corporate clients on mergers, acquisitions and spinoffs. All these services earned fees.On its face, it strikes one as a sly attempt at blaming this mess Gramm-Leach-Bliley, which permits investment banks to invest for themselves. What Samuelson really gets at is the foolishness of the investing, not the legality of it. The problem isn’t that investment banks are permitted to invest for themselves. The problem is that they invested foolishly.
Now, most financial firms also invest for themselves. They use partners' or shareholders' money to place bets on stocks, bonds and other securities -- so-called "principal transactions." Merrill and other retail brokers, which once served individual clients, have ventured into investment banking. So have some commercial banks that were barred from doing so until the repeal in 1999 of the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933.
Second, Wall Street's compensation is heavily skewed toward annual bonuses, reflecting the profits traders and managers earned in the year. Despite lavish base salaries, bonuses dominate. Managing directors with 15 years' experience can receive bonuses five to 10 times their base salaries of $200,000 to $300,000.
Finally, investment banks rely heavily on borrowed money, called "leverage" in financial lingo. Lehman was typical. In late 2007, it held almost $700 billion in stocks, bonds and other securities. Meanwhile, its shareholders' investment (equity) was about $23 billion. All the rest was supported by borrowings. The "leverage ratio" was 30 to 1.
Leverage can create huge windfalls. Suppose you buy a stock for $100. It goes to $110. You made 10 percent, a decent return. Now suppose you borrowed $90 of the $100. If the price rises to $101, you've made 10 percent on your $10 investment. (Technically, the price has to exceed $101 slightly to cover interest payments.) If it goes to $110, you've doubled your money. Wow.
Once assembled, these components created a manic machine for gambling. Traders and money managers had huge incentives to do whatever would increase short-term profits. Dubious mortgages were packaged into bonds, sold and traded. Investment houses had huge incentives to increase leverage. While the boom continued, government remained aloof. Congress resisted tougher regulation for Fannie and Freddie and permitted them to run leverage ratios that, by plausible calculations, exceeded 60 to 1.
It wasn't that Wall Street's leaders deceived customers or lenders into taking risks that were known to be hazardous. Instead, they concluded that risks were low or nonexistent. They fooled themselves, because the short-term rewards blinded them to the long-term dangers. Inevitably, these surfaced. Mortgages went bad. The powerful logic of high leverage went into reverse. Losses eroded firms' tiny capital bases, raising doubts about their survival.
Yes, the law permits foolishness.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
- James Frank Solís
- Former soldier (USA). Graduate-level educated. Married 26 years. Texas ex-patriate. Ruling elder in the Presbyterian Church in America.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(252)
-
▼
September
(45)
- On the “contrived” necessity of state control
- Self-government versus the police state
- Death to the world? -- Wisdom Sunday
- Although they made mention of fundamental differen...
- McCain gives his resume again to make a guarantee....
- Another mini-speech by McCain.Both of them are lon...
- Yes, let's get healthcare for everyone. Let's also...
- If we truly are focused solely on Iraq (think abou...
- Senator Obama, why are we just assuming that those...
- You too, Senator Obama. Yes or no. And then the el...
- I wish McCain could just have answered yes or no o...
- I've been thinking: McCain just said that Russia w...
- I've looked. And I can't find any one of substance...
- Oh, yes. Internation peace keepers -- they always ...
- Yes, it was really silly of the President to talk ...
- Oh, I see. We just explain to Russia that they can...
- Yes, sit down with someone who has called Israel a...
- So, McCain must unquestionably yield to his adviso...
- One difference between the Soviet Union on the one...
- The War in Iraq has strengthened Iran? He can't be...
- I don't know that Iran's neighbors will feel the n...
- In all honesty, Senator McCain, how can anyone kno...
- Great: the Battle of the Bracelets.You just knew h...
- Now mini-campaign speech from Senator McCain.I don...
- But troops ought to be on the defensive, Senator O...
- Exactly: the strategy which Obama condems in Iraq ...
- No one said Iraq was directly involved in 911. Wha...
- There we go with another mention of bin Ladin. If ...
- Good point, Senator McCain: Obama concedes that th...
- Blogging the debate
- Not quite innocent
- Sure McCain ruined the bailout deal, but so what?
- The manic gambling machine
- Better uses for $700 Billion
- Why is anyone still listening to Paulson and Berna...
- Not even half-empty
- Gramm-Leach-Bliley caused all this? Okay, but how?
- The love of money
- The church as a hospital -- Wisdom Sunday
- Sure, blame God
- Okay, Jesus was a community organizer...of sorts
- Vote for Obama because it’s what Europeans want
- In memory of the 9-11 attacks, but probably not a ...
- And I thought Palin was too kind
- More of the same? Great, considering the alternative.
-
▼
September
(45)
![](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_RFgJwzd0I9U/TStdEgBj6hI/AAAAAAAAAOs/tfAshCEGDvo/S253/shadow_me.jpg)
0 comments: