27 October 2008
Where the law is subservient and impotent
3:15 PM
Of course, the real question , still thinking about “economic plans”, is whether the Constitution actually empowers the not-so-federal government to “fix” or “run” or “manage” our economy in the first place. We can also wonder whether it is empowered to “fix” a healthcare “crisis”. But why bother. The only time Republicans worry about extra-constitutional actions is when a Democrat does them. The only time Democrats worry about extra-constitutional actions is when a Republican does them. It shouldn’t surprise us when Democrats do it: they believe in a “living, breathing” document. So the darn thing doesn’t really say anything anyway – until it’s been “interpreted” by a (liberal) judge.
It’s a sick sort of joke, however, to hear John McCain, talk about his desire to appoint judges who will strictly interpret the Constitution. We are, after all, talking about the same John McCain has plans to fix both our economy and our healthcare crisis.
By happenstance, I happen to be re-reading Plato’s Laws. Several days ago I read this passage on the importance of the rule of law. Enjoy.
It’s a sick sort of joke, however, to hear John McCain, talk about his desire to appoint judges who will strictly interpret the Constitution. We are, after all, talking about the same John McCain has plans to fix both our economy and our healthcare crisis.
By happenstance, I happen to be re-reading Plato’s Laws. Several days ago I read this passage on the importance of the rule of law. Enjoy.
[I]n your State we shall assign office to a man, not because he is wealthy, nor because he possesses any other quality of the kind--such as strength or size or birth; but the ministration of the laws must be assigned…to that man who is most obedient to the laws and wins the victory for obedience in the State,--the highest office to the first, the next to him that shows the second degree of mastery, and the rest must similarly be assigned, each in succession, to those that come next in order. And those…I have now called “ministers” of the laws…in the belief that salvation, or ruin, for a State hangs upon nothing so much as this. For wherever in a State the law is subservient and impotent, over that State I see ruin impending; but wherever the law is lord over the magistrates, and the magistrates are servants to the law, there I descry salvation and all the blessings that the gods bestow on States. (715b--d)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
- James Frank Solís
- Former soldier (USA). Graduate-level educated. Married 26 years. Texas ex-patriate. Ruling elder in the Presbyterian Church in America.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(252)
-
▼
October
(59)
- When you’re owed, you don’t have to do it for your...
- It’s not communism when you share your own goods, ...
- Politicothink
- Nothing less than delusional
- Speaking of voters
- Where the law is subservient and impotent
- No windows were broken in the fixing of this economy
- "Greed" explains nothing
- Well of course “socialist” is code for “black”
- Actually, I’m Joe the Plumber
- We can finally win the wars on poverty and drugs!
- We all want to spread the wealth, but…
- If it looks like the Emperor has no clothes then y...
- Rational voters don’t exist…
- Whence this lack of confidence?
- Is credit the lifeblood of capitalism?
- Democratic totalitarianism
- Obama and McCain: The Fundamental Likeness
- What don't you know and how are you going to learn...
- Okay. And we also cannot allow Iran to get nuclear...
- Now there's a good question: Would we commit troop...
- The simple fact of the matter is that Russia has a...
- How can we avoid another Cold War?Why not ask how ...
- Yes, Senator Obama, we'll just make the Iraqis tak...
- Wait a minute. Obama says that if Pakistan is eith...
- Yet one more swipe at the taking-of-the-eye-off-th...
- Of course, with respect to that previous posting, ...
- Oh, now moral issues at stake can justify military...
- There we go! The business about How Iraq had nothi...
- How will our current problems affect our ability t...
- Obama thinks healthcare should be a right.America ...
- Is healthcare in American a privilege, a right or ...
- Senator McCain asks (regarding healthcare): Don't ...
- So what if employer-based healthcare came unravell...
- Should healthcare be treated as a commodity?Whatev...
- A Manhattan Project to deal with Global Warming?Wo...
- We can create 5 million new jobs by making an inve...
- Is this woman kidding? Make Congress move faster o...
- I have fought this. I have fought that.Let's get o...
- Ah, now comes McCain.To miss yet another opportuni...
- Obama will explain the tax system.Tax cut for 95% ...
- Give Congress a date to reform Social Security.Ref...
- Senator McCain, please try informing the public th...
- See, McCain should have known that business about ...
- Yes, yes. After 911 we were all singing kumba ya a...
- What sacrifices will they ask us to make to restor...
- If the American people decide to do something, it ...
- Oh. Wow. We're going to have to prioritize.What do...
- Yes, Senator McCain, you've done so well at reachi...
- Examine our proposals for the economy.For Pete's s...
- Good job, Senator McCain. Don't hit Obama with the...
- How does Obama know she's been carrying on her res...
- Yes, Senator Obama. Let's coordinate with other na...
- If you need a loan to make payroll, you were proba...
- Okay. Apparently there's an important distinction ...
- Oh, great. An Economy Czar we can identify with. G...
- And they're off!!!
- Was there a hole in the parachute?
- What we’ve got here is failure to regulate
-
▼
October
(59)
0 comments: