19 May 2006
All the half-truths fit to broadcast
9:08 AM
Reporting the not-exactly-the-news, is just in some journalists’ blood, I guess. As I mentioned in my previous post, the House passed an amendment making English the official language of the union. Just this morning, as I was driving in to work, listening to Denver’s KOA-AM radion, April Zesbaugh referred to it as the latest in the “English-only” debate. Now, I listen to KOA-AM almost daily—when I listen to Denver radio. I know that April isn’t stupid; she knows very well that no one in favor of our union having an official language is at the same time in favor of having a requirement that only English be spoken. What it does require is that people who participate in our political process do so in English. Frankly, I don’t see the big deal: my family have been doing that for several generations. Even today, I take a sick pleasure in saying, “Speak to me in English, please,” when those DNC and RNC pollsters call my house.
Now, it’s true that other nations have more than one official language. The Swiss Confederation (a.k.a. Switzerland) has four: French, German, Italian and Romansh. No doubt we have those here in the U.S. who think we should do likewise. These are the sort of people who seem always to preface certain comments with, “Well, in Europe they….” Yes. Well, it’s like I’ve told my sister-in-law a couple of times: If you want to live like a European there’s a simple way you can fulfill that desire without bothering the rest of us.
Now, I wonder why April, who certainly knows better, wants to call this an “English-only” debate. I’ll hazard a guess: to motivate the uninformed but well-intentioned to oppose official English, by calling it English only. (Really: who would seriously argue that no one be allowed to speak or write any language but English even in private conversation? A few, perhaps. But that isn’t what the rest of us are talking about.) I would imagine that, having worked for NPR, April is quite accustomed to mischaracterizing and caricaturing Rightist positions.
When are these people going to learn? We’re onto them; it isn’t going to work for much longer.
You know, it occurs to me that what we’re seeing here on the part of mainstream media is their Operation Nordwind.
English only. Give me a break.
Now, it’s true that other nations have more than one official language. The Swiss Confederation (a.k.a. Switzerland) has four: French, German, Italian and Romansh. No doubt we have those here in the U.S. who think we should do likewise. These are the sort of people who seem always to preface certain comments with, “Well, in Europe they….” Yes. Well, it’s like I’ve told my sister-in-law a couple of times: If you want to live like a European there’s a simple way you can fulfill that desire without bothering the rest of us.
Now, I wonder why April, who certainly knows better, wants to call this an “English-only” debate. I’ll hazard a guess: to motivate the uninformed but well-intentioned to oppose official English, by calling it English only. (Really: who would seriously argue that no one be allowed to speak or write any language but English even in private conversation? A few, perhaps. But that isn’t what the rest of us are talking about.) I would imagine that, having worked for NPR, April is quite accustomed to mischaracterizing and caricaturing Rightist positions.
When are these people going to learn? We’re onto them; it isn’t going to work for much longer.
You know, it occurs to me that what we’re seeing here on the part of mainstream media is their Operation Nordwind.
English only. Give me a break.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
- James Frank Solís
- Former soldier (USA). Graduate-level educated. Married 26 years. Texas ex-patriate. Ruling elder in the Presbyterian Church in America.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(300)
-
▼
May
(51)
- A nation of disregarded laws
- Support your local trespasser
- I couldn't have said it better
- "Only" fiction. Right.
- Coming soon: The GreatWall of Europe?
- Show me the money!!!
- 616 pages of "comprehensive"... oh, goody!
- Obscene profits?
- Look, people, it isn't amnest, okay?
- Life in the shadows?
- If they're not criminals...
- Fox doesn't like fences
- "American" no more--and no less
- Zorro vists Aztlan
- If we build it...
- At least one problem with any proposed solution
- If you're going to say something, by all means do so
- Presidential non sequitur
- Stop the Republicans before it's too late!
- Something else Dems aren't saying
- More pro (illegal) immigration (non) logic
- What Democrats aren't saying
- The Strawman, again
- ¿Somos amigos?
- It's a red-letter day
- A little R&R
- Unlike the rest of us...
- Okay. If this isn't amnesty...
- All the half-truths fit to broadcast
- And speaking of (non) amnesty...
- No, really, it's not amnesty
- What John McCain pretends not to know
- Any white guy will do
- Decadent? Well, tu quoque
- Good? Maybe, but...
- More on S.2611
- UN help is on the way!!!
- "Underwhelmed" would be an understatement
- Heritage Foundation: "Not encouraging" would be hi...
- All we are saying...
- Oh (Big) Brother!
- My Problem with Andrew Sullivan's Problem
- Women's Clothing: a deep thought
- Of course it's not your fault: this is America
- Hispanics opposed to illegal Mexican immigration?
- Kudos to KNUS Denver
- Okay. I've got nothing on Walter Mitty, but if I ...
- Hatchet, Axe and Saw--revisited
- ¿Quieres trabajar en México?
- Día sín hispanos: the day after
- Día sín hispanos
-
▼
May
(51)
0 comments: