18 May 2006
No, really, it's not amnesty
4:55 PM
A speaker at a conference held a few weeks ago by a certain research institute I am afiliated with called me and my ilk to task for not being truthful about the President’s plan. I and my ilk call it either “stealth amnesty” or “amnesty light.” The speaker outlined the President’s plan and, focusing on the fines and the fact that the plan only puts illegals on a path to citizenship rather than granting them citizenship by fiat, insisted that this is not amnesty. Now, of course, I and my ilk, insist that it is not full amnesty, but in the end the still get to stay. They don’t have to go back to Mexico and wait there, like people from other countries have to do. We can argue about that, I suppose. But I just heard on Hugh Hewitt's show (he was talking to Mark Steyn) that there are those in Congress who want these illegals to receive, when their day comes, all of the social security which they “earned” while they were illegal. So first, they are going to be fined or made to pay back taxes, or whatever. Then, when they retire, they will get social security as if they had been here legally the entire time of their stay. Now, unless I have just misunderstood, that is even better than amnesty. I’ll have to double check (it’ll probably by up at Radio Blogger later) and make sure I heard right. But then, seriously, it wouldn’t surprise me.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
- James Frank Solís
- Former soldier (USA). Graduate-level educated. Married 26 years. Texas ex-patriate. Ruling elder in the Presbyterian Church in America.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(300)
-
▼
May
(51)
- A nation of disregarded laws
- Support your local trespasser
- I couldn't have said it better
- "Only" fiction. Right.
- Coming soon: The GreatWall of Europe?
- Show me the money!!!
- 616 pages of "comprehensive"... oh, goody!
- Obscene profits?
- Look, people, it isn't amnest, okay?
- Life in the shadows?
- If they're not criminals...
- Fox doesn't like fences
- "American" no more--and no less
- Zorro vists Aztlan
- If we build it...
- At least one problem with any proposed solution
- If you're going to say something, by all means do so
- Presidential non sequitur
- Stop the Republicans before it's too late!
- Something else Dems aren't saying
- More pro (illegal) immigration (non) logic
- What Democrats aren't saying
- The Strawman, again
- ¿Somos amigos?
- It's a red-letter day
- A little R&R
- Unlike the rest of us...
- Okay. If this isn't amnesty...
- All the half-truths fit to broadcast
- And speaking of (non) amnesty...
- No, really, it's not amnesty
- What John McCain pretends not to know
- Any white guy will do
- Decadent? Well, tu quoque
- Good? Maybe, but...
- More on S.2611
- UN help is on the way!!!
- "Underwhelmed" would be an understatement
- Heritage Foundation: "Not encouraging" would be hi...
- All we are saying...
- Oh (Big) Brother!
- My Problem with Andrew Sullivan's Problem
- Women's Clothing: a deep thought
- Of course it's not your fault: this is America
- Hispanics opposed to illegal Mexican immigration?
- Kudos to KNUS Denver
- Okay. I've got nothing on Walter Mitty, but if I ...
- Hatchet, Axe and Saw--revisited
- ¿Quieres trabajar en México?
- Día sín hispanos: the day after
- Día sín hispanos
-
▼
May
(51)
0 comments: